Letter sent to 'The
  Tennessean' Newspaper on behalf of Harold
 
   
  TO   The Tennessean
        
  Gannett Co. Inc.
        
  1100 Broadway
        
  Nashville, TN  37203                                               
  Nov 10, 2005
   
  Dear Sir:
      This is not a
  "Letter to the Editor," although I would welcome its
  publication in the newspaper; however, it is primarily to describe a certain
  disgusting situation in one of Tennessee's prisons, the NWCC in Tiptonville,
  and I think it is very newsworthy.  Perhaps you might assign a reporter
  to do a story about it.
   
      On October 124, the
  prison paralegal for Site 2, Harold H. Thompson, 63 years old, was brutally
  beaten up in the Law Library by a bunch of Aryan Brotherhood thugs.  This
  is the 2nd time Mr. Thompson has been targeted by this hate group for doing
  legal work for prisoners of color.  Mr. Thompson is white.  The
  first attack occurred at the prison in Only, TN, which resulted in Mr.
  Thompson being transferred to Tiptonville about 4 years ago.  Mr.
  Thompson at one time had, while incarcerated, a brain aneurysm which was
  terminally dangerous and which required brain surgery, with a metal plate
  being inserted into his skull, so beatings to the head are especially
  dangerous to him.  He also experienced multiple lacerations and a
  dislocated finger when his hands were ground into the floor by booted feet,
  and has been coughing up blood for 3 now, post this attack.
   
      Per prison protocol,
  the victim of a beating is locked up in a segregation setting, called High
  Security Annex, as well as the perpetrators, and while there, his belongings
  were subjected to the intense scrutiny that the perps also receive.  It
  so happens that Mr. Thompson had a Brothers Word Processor which he had bought
  with his own money in order to type the legal briefs, as the equipment
  provided by the state is shabby and inadequate.  In those days, this
  purchase was permitted, but later the rules were changed so that prisoners can
  no longer purchase typing equipment.  Those that already had it, though,
  were "grandfathered."  Next, the rules changed again so that
  grandfathered machines could no longer be sent out for repair.  When Mr.
  Thompson's typewriter broke down (the 2nd one of his own that he typed to
  death in the course of his paralegal work), he had no way to fix or replace
  it.  The State machine he was given to use was a manual typewriter with
  one inoperative key.  The only elec. typewriter available had to be
  shared with a counselor's aide.  Further, the Law Library which is
  federally mandated to be open 37.5 hours per week, was being used frequently
  as a place for disciplinary hearings and meetings, so that the mandated nr of
  hours was falling seriously short.  Making compliance with the mandate
  even harder was a certain sergeant who insisted for a while--although the Law
  Library was not under her jurisdiction--that Mr. Thompson should be locked in
  his cell on Sundays (one of his assigned workdays) so that he could not go to
  work.  When this petty harassment was brought to the attention of the
  warden by sensible counselors, it stopped, but just at this time. Mr. Thompson
  took the risk of purchasing a similar-type word processor from another inmate
  who was being transferred.  This kidn of exchange, normal in free
  society, is again the rules in prison, being called "unauthorized
  transfer."  But because the State would not provide workable typing
  equipment, Mr. Thompson, out of devotion to his job--which, after all, is a
  "volunteer" one of sorts, as he is not paid for doing it--took the
  chance of buying this machine which, like his, had been "grandfathered
  in."  When he was severaly beaten up and placed in the HSA, it was
  discovered that his new-model Brothers word processor did not have the same
  serial nr as his old model, so the new machine, which cost $250 (a fortune for
  a prisoner) was confiscated.  And for what purpose?  So that the Law
  Library will STILL not have workable equipment for the proper processing of
  legal briefs.
   
      So now Mr. Thompson
  sits, injured, jobless, bereft of his newly purchased word processor, and
  totally demoralized in the HSA.  Can you imagine, in the free world, any
  person so dedicated to his job that he would take such risks to person and
  property to volunteer to help others with their legal work?  It reminds
  me of those who made such sacrifices to register voters in the South in the
  early '60's of the Civil Rights era.  Our country has REAL
  problems--people killed daily in Iraq, victims of hurricanes without proper
  emergency assistance, skyrocketing fuel costs.  It seems unbelievable
  that so much bureaucratic energy could be wasted impeding a person trying to
  do necessary legal work at every turn.  Really, it makes no sense
  whatsoever, and I put it to you:  why not make an exception, considering
  it is a voluntary provision of essential work-related equipment not provided
  by the State, and allow Mr. Thompson to have his newer work processor as a
  replacement for his original one that he totally wore out in performing his
  unpaid job?  I am certain that someone in authority, if he has common
  sense and thinking power, could bring himself to make a decision of that
  magnitude.  Only, considering the reality of the imprisonment setting,
  cut off from outside scrutiny, such a fair and sensible decision would not be
  made--without your help.  Therefore, I urge you to turn your influence
  and attention to this real-life situation, and enable this hardworking and
  elderly prisonor to get on with his life's vocation:  helping others file
  their legitimate legal paperwork.  Is this asking too much?
   
      Lastly, Mr. Thompson
  was convicted to a life sentence for the murder of a police informer, J.
  Walter Crawley, who was himself convicted, then released on appellate bond, in
  the beating death of the mother of Mr. Thompson's son, at that time a child
  and an eyewitness to the death of his mother, about which he testified at
  trial.  Mr. Crawley, when released, bragged in a bar that the son of Mr.
  Thompson would not live to testify against him at his re-trial.  The
  State convicted Mr. Thompson of Crawley's murder, altho there were no
  eyewitnesses to testify to his identity.  Mr. Thompson has now been
  incarcerated 25 years.  How much more evidence of rehabilitation could
  one need other than such devotion to an unpaid job to benefit others that one
  would risk beatings and confiscation of essential and costly equipment in
  order to help them?
   
      Thank you for your
  interest in this matter.